![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEjjsm-4RLdtado3io1I5zotDxeH0fy6gXbs97JyTdx89wLDFtk2fjuFDzuEZoYLctlUSRINnjHzAqMz5PkTAYipl23fe-AtW0ha8CoOEKNLrt2E0yw5PAb36atdz_UYt1bv5Y9kKZS89cx9/s1600/speed+limit.jpg)
His logic goes like this; ''The other day when I walked out from town hall I nearly got run over from a cyclist who shot through a red light as I was crossing Little Collins Street right in front of town hall.''
I would contend that the problem here was not the speed of the cyclist but the fact that they shot through a red light. Therefore, cyclists should not be allowed to go through red lights. Which they're not. So that's sorted then.
I'm all for lower speed limits, but it should be a consistent speed limit for all vehicles. I think it's pretty obvious that cars are more dangerous than bikes so I can't see any reason why bikes should have to go slower than cars. Sure, bikes are silent but cars weigh a thousand kilograms and are two metres wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment